Friday, April 17, 2009

Oral Presntation

The feasibility report is a good written presentation documenting the activities involving the candidate system. The pivotal step, however, is selling the proposed change. Invariably the project leader or analyst is expected to give an oral presentation to the end use. Although it is not as polished as the written redpoll’s, the oral presentation has several important objectives, The most critical requirements for the analyst who gives the oral presentation are (11 communication skills and knowledge about the candidate sys­ tem that can be translated into language und8l'standable to the user, and (2) the ability to answer questions, clarify issues, maintain credibility, and pick up on any new ideas or suggestions.

The substance and form of the presentation depend largely on the purposes sought. The presentation may aim at informing, confirming, or persuading
1. Informing. This simply means communicating the decisions already reached on system recommendations and the resulting action plans to those who will participate in the implementation. No detailed findings or conclusions are included.
2. Confirming. A presentation with this purpose verifies facts and recommendations already discussed and agreed upon. Unlike the persuading
3.
1. Introduction.
a. Introduce self
b. Introduce topic.
c. Briefly describe current system
1. Explain why it is not solving the problem.

2. Body of presentation.
a. Highlight weaknesses of current system.
b. Describe proposed system. How is it going to solve the problem?
c. Sell proposed system.
1. Specify savings and benefits, costs and expenses.
2. Use visual aids to justify project and explain system.
d. Summarize implementation plan and schedule.
e. Review human resources requirements to install system.
f.
3. Conclusion.
a. Summarize proposal.
b. Restate recommendations and objectives of proposal.
c. Ask for' top-level management support. Solicit go-ahead for project.
4. Discussion period-Answer questions convincingly. approach, no supportive evidence is presented to sell the proposed change, nor is there elaborate reasoning behind recommendations and conclusions. Although the presentation ;s not detailed, it should be complete. Confirming is itself part of the process of securing approval. It should reaffirm the benefits of the candidate system and provide a clear statement of results to be achieved.
approach, no supportive evidence is presented to sell the proposed change, nor is there elaborate reasoning behind recommendations and conclusions. Although the presentation ;s not detailed, it should be complete. Confirming is itself part of the process of securing approval. It should reaffirm the benefits of the candidate system and provide a clear statement of results to be achieved
IV. Discussion period-Answer questions convincingly.
approach, no supportive evidence is presented to sell the proposed change, nor is there elaborate reasoning behind recommendations and conclusions. Although the presentation ;s not detailed, it should be complete. Confirming is itself part of the process of securing approval. It should reaffirm the benefits of the candidate system and provide a clear statement of results to be achieved.
3. Persuading. This is a presentation pitched toward selling ideas-at­ tempts to convince executives to take action on recommendations for implementing a candidate system.

,Regardless of the purpose sought, the effectiveness of the oral presentation depends on how successful the project team has been in gaining the confidence of frontline personnel during the initial investigation. How the recommendations are presented also has an impact. Here are some pointers on how to give an oral presentation:

1. Rehearse and test your ideas before the presentation. Show that you <1I'e in command. Appear relaxed
2. Final recommendations are more easily accepted if they are presented as ideas far discussion, even though they seem to be settled and final.

3. The presentation should be brief, factual, and interesting. Clarity and persuasiveness are critical. Skill is needed to generate enthusiasm and interest throughout the presentation.
4. Use good organization. Distribute relevant material to the user and other parties in advance.
5. Visual aids (graphs, charts) are effective if they are simple, meaningful, and imaginative. An effective graph should teach or tell what is to be communicated.
6. Most important, present the report in an appropriate physical environment where the acoustics, seating pattern, visual aid technology, and refreshments are all available.

The most important element to consider is the length of the presentation The duration often depends on the complexity of the project, the interest of the user group, and the competence of the project team. A study that has companywide applications and took months to complete would require hours or longer to present. The user group that was involved at the outset would likely permit a lengthy presentation, although familiarity with the project often dictates a brief presentation. Unfortunately, many oral presentations tend to be a rehash of the written document, with little flare or excitement. Also, when the analyst or the project leader has a good reputation and success record from previous projects, the end user may request only a brief presentation.

No comments:

Post a Comment